top of page

California's High-Speed Rail Project Charts New Course Toward Commercial Success

California's bold new plan for high-speed rail shifts to connect major population centers quickly and innovate funding models for commercial success. These changes focus on long-term viability for the nation's first high-speed passenger rail system.

California's bold new plan for high-speed rail shifts to connect major population centers quickly and innovate funding models for commercial success. These changes focus on long-term viability for the nation's first high-speed passenger rail system.

August 26, 2025

Ryan Pecaut

In a move that could serve as a model for large-scale rail projects nationwide, the California High-Speed Rail Authority has released a new supplemental report outlining a significant change in strategy for its ambitious statewide network. The report, which provides a fresh look at project delivery, funding, and financial viability, signals a new, more pragmatic direction for the nation's first true high-speed rail system.


Instead of simply building the statutorily required Merced-Bakersfield segment as a standalone line, the Authority is now focused on a path to connect major population centers and demonstrate commercial success as early as possible.



A Strategic Pivot Toward Viability


At the direction of its new CEO, Ian Choudri, the Authority has completed a holistic reassessment of the program. This review led to a new focus on building a commercially viable system as quickly as possible, aiming to maximize the return on California's investment.


The report presents three main scenarios for development, with each one offering a different level of ridership and revenue potential:


  • Merced-Bakersfield: The initial 171-mile segment, which is currently under construction and has a revised cost estimate of $36.75 billion. The report indicates this segment alone would not be profitable, resulting in a recovery ratio of just 45% to 74% annually.

Map of California High-Speed Rail. Blue line from Merced to Bakersfield, grey lines for future connections. Cities labeled, white background.
Map of scenario 1 which provides service from Merced to Bakersfield
  • Gilroy-Bakersfield: This option costing $54.4 billion extends the line north from the Central Valley to Gilroy, relying on an enhanced Caltrain corridor to provide through service to San Francisco by 2038. This scenario is projected to be commercially successful, with a recovery ratio of 164% to 257%.

High-speed rail map shows routes from Gilroy to Bakersfield and future connections to Palmdale with through service from Gilroy to San Francisco and regional service on the San Joaquin train to Sacramento.
Map of scenario 2 which provides service from Gilroy to Bakersfield
  • Gilroy-Palmdale: The most ambitious scenario at a cost of $87.12 billion would extend the high-speed rail infrastructure from Gilroy all the way to Palmdale by 2038, connecting with existing Metrolink services to reach the Los Angeles area. The report projects this option would be highly profitable, with a recovery ratio of 191% to 314%.


High-speed rail map shows routes from Gilroy to Bakersfield and future connections to Palmdale with through service from Gilroy to San Francisco and Palmdale to Victor Valley which allows connection to Brightline West rail to Las Vegas.
Map of scenario 3 which provides service from Gilroy to Palmdale

Building a Financially Sustainable System


A major part of the new strategy is leveraging "ancillary revenues" and "asset commercialization". The Authority plans to generate income from sources beyond ticket sales, such as real estate development around stations and leasing its right-of-way for fiber-optic lines and other utilities. These revenues, along with a proposed dedicated and stable funding source from the state's Cap-and-Invest program, are seen as the key to attracting private investment through Public-Private Partnership (P3) models.


To reduce overall project costs and accelerate delivery, the Authority is also implementing a "right-sizing" approach. This involves refining the design criteria, such as adjusting the maximum design speed from 250 mph to the operational speed of 220 mph, and allowing for steeper track gradients to shorten the length of expensive tunnels and viaducts.


This report follows recent news of the USDOT pulling back funding from the project citing it as a boondoggle following a review showing a project estimate of $135 billion.

Support Us

We're the largest passenger rail and transit advocate in Ohio. Help us make a difference in the Midwest.

ConnectedPoster - 9.jpg

Ryan Pecaut

Ryan Pecaut is the communications strategy lead at All Aboard Ohio and a career professional in transportation analytics

Our Mission

We advocate for better transit and passenger rail throughout the Midwest. Your support helps us.

Learn about advance appropriations established for 2026 and the important funding dates for the future. To support the future of passenger rail efforts across Ohio and the nation, understanding the How, What and Why of passenger rail financing is crucial.

News Story

How does new passenger rail get funded at the federal level?

The rediscovered 1992 3C test train reminds us that Ohioans has come very close before and with the support today – Almost 80 percent of Ohioans – we cannot afford to let another opportunity pass us by

AAO Blog Post

A Rare Look at What Could Have Been: The 1992 Amtrak 3C Test Train

An All Aboard Ohio member provides an interesting comparison between the Bay Area and Ohio's transportation infrastructure, focused on trains.

AAO Blog Post

OPINION: The Bay Area vs. Ohio: Transportation Freedom vs. Transportation Desert

The funding that kickstarted Ohio’s passenger rail renaissance has an expiration date. A new analysis from the Eno Center reveals why returning to the budget models of the past could derail the 3C&D corridor just as it gains momentum—and that we must demand multi-year appropriations to keep the project on track.

Featured Post

Escaping the Doom Cycle of Passenger Rail Funding

ABOUT ALL ABOARD OHIO
All Aboard Ohio is a non-profit, member-based organization dedicated to promoting improved public transportation and passenger rail service throughout the state. 

Founded in 1973 and incorporated as a registered 501c-3 in 1987, All Aboard Ohio has spent more than 50 years advocating, educating, and working towards our goal of a connected Midwest

All Aboard Ohio is a 501c-3 nonprofit with over 50 years of advocacy work, advocating for improved public transportation and passenger rail service in the Midwest

©2025 by All Aboard Ohio

Get in Touch

Contact us form

info@allaboardohio.org

3136 Kingsdale Center, 


#112 Columbus, OH 43221

Federal Tax ID: 31-1066182

  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Threads

All Aboard Ohio is a 501c-3 nonprofit with over 50 years of advocacy work, advocating for improved public transportation and passenger rail service in the Midwest

©2025 by All Aboard Ohio

Get in Touch

Contact us form

info@allaboardohio.org

3136 Kingsdale Center, 


#112 Columbus, OH 43221

Federal Tax ID: 31-1066182

  • Instagram
  • Bluesky
  • Threads
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
bottom of page